Michael Brown shooting case: Video showcases the cop who shot the teen to death, reveals new clues

November 16, 2014 By AH 59 Comments

The newly surfaced dispatch calls and surveillance videos in the shooting case involving 18-year-old Michael Brown has exposed some strong clues suggesting a different story against Ferguson police officer Darren Wilson, who had shot dead the unarmed youth.

The video footage shows the Ferguson cop leaving for the hospital hours after he fatally shot at Brown. The St. Louis-Post Dispatch has obtained the videos.

Brown was shot six times by Wilson.

The killing of the teen has sparked weeks of protest in the Missouri city. The case is currently being looked by the Department of Justice.

The footage shows 28-year-old Wilson leaving the police station with another cop and a police union lawyer two hours after the unfortunate incident.

In a statement, the attorneys representing the Brown family said,”Information was leaked from within the police department that Wilson was severely beaten and suffered an orbital eye socket ‘blowout,’ indicating that Michael Brown somehow deserved to die. From the video released today it would appear the initial descriptions of his injuries were exaggerated.”

According to the lawyers, the audio tapes has not show Wilson making any form of connection with Brown or an incident occurring at a convenience store just minutes before that cop later said Brown was involved in.

Moreover, the dispatch calls has revealed that how quickly the things between Wilson and Brown escalated.

In the video, Wilson was heard extending help to the other units in locating a robbery suspect.

“You guys need me?” he was heard saying in the recordings.

10 minutes later, another cop was heard asking for help in controlling the scene where Brown was shot.

“Get us several more units over here. There’s going to be a problem,” said the officer in the video.

A woman was also seen crying in the background in the dispatched call.

SunnyDeigo

Indict that power-tripping, racist POS.
- Maggiemay
  
  New to this country, are we? Welcome. You’ve got a lot to learn.
- drizzy
  
  So you think this officer just drove around looking for a black person to shoot? Too bad he didn’t shoot your ignorant dumb ass. I guess it’s ok that this kid robbed a convenient store too? Yea, great citizen.
Curt Oleski

yes if Wilson did nothing wrong , why did they lie about him having such a tremendous eye injury? to just justify his shooting is why .
- Svlad Cjelli
  
  Where do you get that they lied about the injuries? The “video of proof” does not clearly show his face.
  You clearly have an idea in your head about what you want to believe.
  - Curt Oleski
    
    Ok so moron here it simple as simple gets. just for you . A broken eye socket is a fracture that requires surgery . That means he would not be able to simply walk back and forth to and from the hospital. but since you are so incredibly ignorant .I could link the injury for you , but you would not be able to even understand that .
- Diane Merriam
  
  That story didn’t come from any official source. It was an internet claim that went viral based on the picture of his black eye and other facial bruising. So “they” didn’t lie, just normal net urban legend tales after any incident of note.
- drizzy
  
  They didn’t lie… it was a leak, meaning it could have been made up by anybody and blown out of proportion. You know… like fairytales and shit.
PieMan

So all the idiots are sticking to their story that the police officer pulled up and shot the thug just for the hell of it? The stupid will remain stupid.
- Curt Oleski
  
  You obviously havent seen the new video of Wilson arresting someone for videoing him . he wasnt the nicest guy in that either. But by all means do no research then comment .
  - Svlad Cjelli
    
    That video does not prove anything in this case. I’m sure that cop is a jerk, but if you fight a cop for his gun, you may get shot.
    - nevenera
      
      We only have the officer’s word for that. He was not shot while while allegedly fighting with the officer, but after when he was running away.
      - drizzy
        
        when he was running away… but running back towards the officer. There’s proof the kid wasn’t shot from behind. There’s evidence he was at point blank range with his hand on the officers gun indicating struggle for the gun. The kid just robbed or at least assisted in a robbery just before. What we have here is just another bad citizen doing bad things who pays the ultimate price for his stupid decision who just so happens to be black, so it must be, just has to be a racist issue. After all, of course this dedicated officer just drives around looking for black people to shoot. People are so ignorant and after this officer is proved innocent and butt buddies racist Sharpton and Jackson are made to look like fools, people will riot and rant and rave just because they were made to look stupid too.
      - PieMan
        
        Nicely said. But it’s still over these fools heads.
      - SunnyDeigo
        
        “dedicated officer” … more like delusional officer
      - drizzy
        
        If he was delusional, he wouldn’t have been on the force for years. You think they just hire people off the street to become officers? There’s training, classes and more training during their career. These people are trained and forced to make decisions quicker than your average Joe. I guess if the store owner would have shot this idiot, he would be delusional too for being robbed right?
      - Diane Merriam
        
        Police officer is one of the jobs that bullies and self-righteous idiots are attracted to along with the idealistic ones that want to make the world a better place.
        
        But it doesn’t matter what classification this particular officer fell under. The issue is, and always has been, in this specific case, under these specific conditions, was he or was he not justified in shooting Brown. From what I’ve read and seen, I tend to believe that in this specific case he was justified. But I wasn’t there and I don’t know what evidence is available to the Grand Jury or what might come out in trial if it gets there.
        
        Bottom line, the only living person who *knows* what happened is Wilson and it all happened so fast that he might not even be sure exactly how it escalated so far so fast.
        
        The only things that are very certain are that at some point there was a struggle over Wilson’s gun in his vehicle during which it went off and Brown was shot in the hand at close enough range that there was also gunpowder residue on his hand. Brown also got a few punches in on Wilson’s face. Brown was moving away and then turned around facing Wilson. The rest of the shots were fired while Brown was facing Wilson at an unknown distance in an unknown position, but not likely in the full classic hands high in the air position, posing an unknown threat.
        
        A 300+ lb guy, looking like a linebacker, who has already gone for your gun once and hit you more than once is coming at you, doesn’t need to have a gun or other weapon to be a very legitimate threat … IF that was the case.
      - drizzy
        
        Police officer is one of the jobs that military veterans and people who love their community that want to help also.
      - Diane Merriam
        
        Agreed. And I’ve known several who were just that type. I’ve also run across a couple of the other sort who have no business with a badge and a gun. My general rule of thumb is to respect them until proven otherwise, but not to assume they’re always one of the good guys.
      - Svlad Cjelli
        
        Well, now we have proof that he was not fleeing but advancing when shot.
    - Jane Dough
      
      Michael brown’s fingerprints were not found on the gun. That is a fact. Deal with it.
      - Svlad Cjelli
        
        No, please share more facts, brainiac. Two people were handling that gun. A lack of fingerprints proves nothing.
        Believe what you want, that’s what you’re doing anyway.
  - PieMan
    
    This is about Micheal Brown making a tragic stupid move on an officer. You go after a cop’s gun WTF do you think is going to happen?
    - Curt Oleski
      
      How do you know what he did? The cops have not been upfront about any of it . all they are doing is covering their own asses .
      - PieMan
        
        Curt your white guilt is on display for everyone to see. Don’t you feel like a Dickhead???
      - Curt Oleski
        
        My white guilt what the fuck are you smoking? All i am saying is simply let justice be served to whatever side is guilty. And all i see is jerkoffs like yourself say oh Wilson was a victim fuck you . You have no more info then whats out now , and its not much . so do I feel like dick naw not so much you on the other hand can suck a huge dick …
      - PieMan
        
        There you go again. Dickhead.
      - Curt Oleski
        
        So says ANON poster grow a set and post under your real name? Only your a coward and would never do that . So there ya go enjoy call me whatever at least I am not hiding …
- nevenera
  
  I just watched a Cops episode where officers were called for a man holding a box cutter and threatening police, the police arrived they told everyone to put their arms up, one complied the other ran at police, who shot him… with a Taser. He was of course white.
  
  People who are upset by this are not upset because they feel that the teenager was shot ‘for the hell of it’ but because the sentence of death seems to be out of proportion to the situation at hand, and that when this happens, it is almost always blacks who end up dying.
  
  They feel that their children even if minorities deserve the same chance to make mistakes and grow up that white teens do.
  - Diane Merriam
    
    Actually, it’s not almost always blacks who end up dying, it’s that those are the ones that the media choose to focus on. It makes a far better seller in terms of people watching or reading the news when it’s interracial then when it’s not, so those cases get the most coverage. The amount of coverage is what people base their perceptions on as to what’s happening in the world, not the actual dry numbers. Sad, but true.
    
    Would you believe that violent crime in general is actually only half of what it was when it peaked in the 90’s? Not by the news you wouldn’t. But that’s actually the case. If we can get rid of this @#$)*&$% war on drugs, it’s going to take another big drop. After all, when was the last time you heard of two liquor store owners shooting it out over customers?
  - triggerpoint1
    
    You compare two entirely different scenarios which lead you to a false conclusion. In your example there are already multiple officers lending support and the officer already has a tasers pulled. In your example the criminal was running away when he was tasered and was not reaching for the officers gun nor was the perpetrator coming at the officer failing to obey the officers commands after having just assaulted the officer and strong arm robbed a store. Of course you make it a racial thing which it isn’t. Let the grand jury work its process and by all means peaceably demonstrate if you feel you must be heard. But do try to avoid setting fires, robbing stores, assaulting officers and starting other chaos while you demonstrate. You lose even more credibility when you do not demonstrate peaceably. Do you and your ilk really think the officer was driving around looking for a black man to shoot? I would hazard a guess and assume that this is not the first person of color that Officer Wilson had tried to arrest. Why weren’t the other black folks he arrested shot instead of arrested? Two entirely different scenarios used to make false conclusion.
- Svlad Cjelli
  
  These people believe what they want. nobody is talking about the video from the market, showing Mr. Brown pushing a store clerk and
  taking cigarillos a short time before his fatal confrontation with
  Officer Wilson. I think this video shows that this kid had no problem putting his hands on people. When you put your hands on a cop and reach for his gun you will likely be shot.
  - SunnyDeigo
    
    Especially if you are black apparently.
Grand1

” A very, very tense atmosphere there, Maura. This adds fuel to the fire. Thanks.”

Is that the media’s goal? To add fuel to the fire so they can get good video for their news product? Thank you for adding fuel to the fire? Really?!
David W

Why do they keep showing the same photo of this man wearing ear phones, cant the press show a better picture. If the officer was negligent in his duties, prosecute him. However, people need to remember video shows him robbing a store minutes before the shooting, even though is not related to the case. Mr Brown wasn’t squeaky clean.
- nevenera
  
  No he was not squeaky clean nor are many other teens of his age who are able to grow up and make a life for themselves despite the stupid things they do as kids. Did his actions warrant a death sentence?
  If one of the teens in the Pumpkin fest riots had died at the hands of the police, would you be as critical of the teen and as supportive of the police? No need to answer here, but in your heart.
- Diane Merriam
  
  For the same reason they kept using the picture of Trayvon Martin as an angelic looking 13 year old instead of what he had become 5 years down the road. It makes for a “better” story that will grab more attention and make more money for the media.
EatingBoogersPlayboi

Another article that brings nothing new, just reiteration of the same ol story.
triggerpoint1

Good thing the store owner that was strong arm robbed didn’t have a weapon to defend his store and himself from Michael or he would be a victim of the community mob mentality that now surrounds officer Wilson. Michael clearly was not afraid of the store owner and likely brought that same attitude to the officer 10 minutes later. One guy could not defend himself while the other guy could.
- nevenera
  
  The store owner was roughed up and intimidated, but not harmed or injured. Did the boy really deserve a death penalty for that?
  - drizzy
    
    Maybe the boy should have asked himself if it was worth the death penalty for doing such stupid acts.
  - MarkVShaney
    
    A white teen in a white neighborhood doesn’t rough up and intimidate store owners. They don’t have to, and have the moral compass to know that it’s not only illegal, but also wrong.
    - Diane Merriam
      
      Baloney! I’ve known plenty of white thugs too. Yes, they steal and beat and kill and do every other wrong thing that black thugs do. Criminality is not limited by race, in any way shape or form.
      - MarkVShaney
        
        “Criminality is not limited by race, in any way shape or form.” Speaking of baloney… – the raw number of incidents of black on white crime is about 5 times higher than white on black crime. If you state the numbers as a weighted average… in other words- if the populations were of equal size the ratio is several hundred to one.
      - Jane Dough
        
        Sorry dude, that is simply not true. So ya know.
      - MarkVShaney
        
        Uh- is too?
  - Diane Merriam
    
    Guilt or innocence has nothing to do with statistics, just with the actual facts of the specific case in question.
- SunnyDeigo
  
  Robbed? It was shoplifting. The store clerk tried to stop him and was roughed up, but it did not begin as an armed or strong-arm robbery. Asset protection specialists and loss control professionals recommend documenting, but not confronting a shoplifter. That should be left to trained security professionals or law enforcement. (This is why bank tellers just hand of the cash when robbed – whether they see a weapon or not). The store clerk confronted the shoplifter and that can also be charged as an assault on Brown as the law is you may not use force to protect property, only to protect life and limb. The store clerk was the aggressor.
  - Diane Merriam
    
    Shoplifting is done sneakily, not with an open grab. Also, I don’t know where you live, but it’s definitely not the standard everywhere, or even most places, that you’re not allowed to use force to protect property.
    
    Property doesn’t just grow on trees and when you take someone’s property, you are taking the portion of his life that was spent earning that property just as surely as if you killed him that much of a time before he would otherwise have died. Yes, property can (maybe, but not always) be replaced, but that doesn’t change the basic facts.
    
    It’s been over three years since my car was stolen and I still haven’t been able to save up enough money to replace it. Instead I’m limited to how far I can go in a wheelchair and then only if it’s not raining or snowing and hoping that I don’t get hit with a car AGAIN since there’s no sidewalks. In an emergency I can get to the bus stop with my walker, but that’s knocks me out for a good two to three weeks. Yet you seem to think that, even if I’d had the opportunity that I shouldn’t have been able to stop them. That’s pretty low.
  - drizzy
    
    I lose a brain cell every time I read one of your posts. You better stay home and please don’t reproduce. Obama will continue to help you.
  - CharleyMartel
    
    Wow, you are one seriously brain damaged dumb fuq.
nevenera

The only way we will find out what happened is if there is a trial. If the officer is innocent, then like everyone else in a similar situation he should be called to prove it in court. If he is innocent, then let everything come out in the open, if he is not, then he should pay the consequences. If the young man had been shot in the car then I can understand, but I am still having trouble with the fact that he was shot after he was no longer a threat to the officer. He had no weapon and for that reason lethal force does not seem to warranted. However, if something comes up in trial to discount that, then so be it.
- drizzy
  
  To help with your trouble, the kid wouldn’t allow the officer to get out of the car, this is where the kid was leaning into the car trying to get the officer’s gun. My understanding is this is where the officer fired a shot and this is where the evidence shows the residue on the boys hand indicating he had his hand on the gun. The boy backs away and the officer gets out of the car and issues demands. The boy turns around and charges the officer. This is where the officer shot him several times. This is the whole debate as to what actually happened. There’s proof that shows his buddy was a liar in saying they were running away and had their hands up. Evidence and ballistics show that the kid was in fact running towards the officer when he was shot. The entry wounds were in the front of his body and the angles indicate he was getting closer and closer proving he was in fact running towards him. It isn’t a racist issue, just the racist are making it a racist issue. The officer didn’t even know this kid was just involved in a robbery minutes before.
- Diane Merriam
  
  You’ve got that backwards. In this country, at least, the defendant doesn’t have to prove innocence, the state has to prove, beyond a reasonable doubt, guilt. A not guilty verdict doesn’t mean the jury is certain that he’s innocent, it means that the prosecutor hasn’t convinced them well enough that they are almost completely sure that he’s guilty.
  
  The job of a Grand Jury is to review the evidence and find it convincing enough that the prosecution has a shot at getting a guilty verdict on the professed criminal action, not to get the verdict itself. That’s a much lower standard than is needed in a trial, so if a Grand Jury doesn’t indict, there’s not much chance that the person would ever be found guilty in a full trial.
- Red Town
  
  Precisely. This obviously needs to go to trial.
drizzy

I’m going to rob a store today. I am going to ignore a police officers request and confront him. I’m not going to let him get out of his car and I’m going to reach for his gun. What will happen or could happen? Do I get his gun and kill him and go on with my life? Do I get killed by him? By the way… you DON’T know what my race is. Think I’ll make the news or will this just be any other day in the city?
SunnyDeigo

This video of Officer Darren Wilson violating a individual’s constitutional rights and arresting him for taking a video. Demonstrating the power trip modus operandi that defines Officer Wilson’s attitude.

http://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2014/nov/16/ferguson-video-shows-darren-wilson-arresting-man-for-recording-him
drizzy

Racist have made this a racist issue. It’s simple.
rothmere

There is cross talk here every which way on every angle or bias. The only real matter is whether facts will be assessed in the course of fair trial. Irrespective herein of the very clear issue of America’s militarized/federalized police state force is growing further from public accountability by the week by any constitutional standard. That said, we are left to trust the justice system imperfectly as it may function. Hey, OJ beat a epic rap, no? I don’t recall any black race specific outrage then. Lol. Ferguson is a ignorable media event frenzy being fueled by weird hybrid liberal antagonist something or other OWS offshoot groups hoping for a momentary transformative of ‘social’ zeitgeist. A young aggressor got popped (probably too quickly) but if the ‘blue plague’ in this nation does not get their chain yanked we’re all going be fall to the same systemic abuse. Peace.